Lit Analysis #3 No Exit

1.  A summary for this would be about people who are totured with limits and the concept of people' hell.

2. I believe the theme is that people can put limits on us and we need to be able to comtol our own limits.

3. The author's tone is mean. He sets three people in a room together with no way out. When you are in a room with the same thing for days it is hard to not be in hell. He is seems a bit harsh when writing this.
4. One element is dialogue. The charcters speak to eachother to show what each of them is thinking. Another element is symblosim for example the place that they are set is a hell to the audience or the readers. But to the characters it is the time, people, place, and mindset that create their hell.



1. Two exampls of indirect characterization is the room itself. It is never directly told to being hell. Another belongs to all characters. You can see the annoyance they have with eachother in the way that they speak. An example of direct characterization is that Inez admitting that she is cruel and Garcin admits that he is disgusted by the two girls.

2. The diction changes when Estelle talks to Garcin because she likes him. She is a lot nicer to him and not as mean.

3. The protagonists are static because they never change. They completey stay in the same mindset.

4. I felt like I had them because it shows that the longer you know someone you begin to see their true colors.